| 1 |
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:54:28 +0100, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >> If it's about performance (in the sense of speed), then paludis |
| 4 |
> >> is worse, because dependency calculation is more complex/complete |
| 5 |
> >> there. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > That makes no sense at all. Paludis is written in a different |
| 8 |
> > language using different algorithms. It's not about the amount of |
| 9 |
> > work it does so much as how efficiently it does it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> That's exactly what I was saying. I was talking about speed, not |
| 12 |
> efficiency. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
But the efficiency of the algorithm, and the language, affects the speed. |
| 15 |
You can't presume "it does more, therefore it takes longer" if the two |
| 16 |
programs do things in very different ways. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Law of Mechanical Repair: After your hands become coated with |
| 23 |
grease, your nose will begin to itch. |
Archives