1 |
On Nov 19, 2011 6:31 AM, "Mick" <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Saturday 19 Nov 2011 09:13:33 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
4 |
> > On 11/18/2011 07:42 PM, Mick wrote: |
5 |
> > > I've changed the title ever so slightly. I am getting an out of |
6 |
memory |
7 |
> > > error with kernel-2.6.39-gentoo-r3 too, so I can't blame it on the |
8 |
> > > kernel. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > The error as far as firefox is concerned is the same. Is this a |
11 |
firefox |
12 |
> > > bug, or is my decrepit old laptop incapable of compiling Firefox ... |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > Am I the only one suffering from this? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > How much RAM do you have? How big if your swap? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> # free |
20 |
> total used free shared buffers cached |
21 |
> Mem: 640392 133084 507308 0 81360 23972 |
22 |
> -/+ buffers/cache: 27752 612640 |
23 |
> Swap: 257004 6156 250848 |
24 |
> |
25 |
> May not be much by today's standards, but I never had an out of memory |
26 |
error |
27 |
> that I can recall just compiling packages in the past. |
28 |
|
29 |
You've never compiled OOo or chromium on that box, have you? Chromium alone |
30 |
takes 4GB on my box at the final link step. |
31 |
|
32 |
Have you changed your CFLAGS since the last time you succesfully built FF? |
33 |
Is -g new? Consider switching to -Os; it won't solve the immediate problem, |
34 |
but it may help reduce overall system pressure by keeping binaries smaller. |
35 |
Also look at adding "splitdebug" to FEATURES. Perhaps adding 2-3GB of swap. |
36 |
|
37 |
What about any new or larger apps consuming system RAM? What does free -m |
38 |
show before your emerge? |
39 |
|
40 |
And, finally, yeah..that isn't just "not much", that's a terribly small |
41 |
amount of memory. Assuming you've kept the software current, some of your |
42 |
applications have certainly not been maintained with 600MB of system memory |
43 |
in mind. |