1 |
On Nov 19, 2011 7:28 PM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
----- >8 snip |
4 |
|
5 |
> And, finally, yeah..that isn't just "not much", that's a terribly small |
6 |
amount of memory. Assuming you've kept the software current, some of your |
7 |
applications have certainly not been maintained with 600MB of system memory |
8 |
in mind. |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
Indeed. With less than 800MB, gcc fails to upgrade. Always. For some |
12 |
RAM-constrained systems (e.g. the VMs in my company's cloud), I even have |
13 |
to do an "out-of-the-box" upgrade, i.e., upgrade an identical copy on the |
14 |
physical data center, grab the binpkg tarball, and upload the tarball to |
15 |
the cloud. |
16 |
|
17 |
Rgds, |