Archives
Archives
| From: | damian <damian.only@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend to ram: correct behavior? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:35:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 47a330c50812310234w1aaad62g51953dda821eaa0c@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend to ram: correct behavior? by Daniel Troeder |
||
| 1 | Hi Daniel, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Thanks for your response. I'll try to make some time to test your tips. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > You can also try booting a Fedora/Ubuntu/SuSE LiveCD, and see if with |
| 6 | > their kernel the same happens (given that suspend works on their |
| 7 | > LiveCD). If they manage to switch off the power to your USB-ports, that |
| 8 | > can give us a hint. |
| 9 | That I can try, I still keep the Ubuntu (shame on me! :P) which I used |
| 10 | to install Gentoo. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Best regards, |
| 13 | Damian. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Suspend to ram: correct behavior? | damian <damian.only@×××××.com> |