1 |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Maxim Wexler<maxim.wexler@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 6/11/09, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Maxim Wexler<maxim.wexler@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> Hi group, |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> Been tracking down other's kern config for 900A w/ N270 Atom cpu and |
7 |
>>> notice, so far, everyone goes for CONFIG_SMP=y. Why, particularly when |
8 |
>>> most commenters stress keeping the kernel as slim as possible? |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> In the <help> window we have 'If you have a system with only one CPU, |
11 |
>>> like most personal computers, say N.' As far as I know the 900A has |
12 |
>>> only one CPU, unless there is some sort of virtual one I haven't heard |
13 |
>>> of yet. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Does the CPU have multiple cores? If so, that's probably why. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> hmm, when I %cat /proc/cpuinfo I get processor :0 at the top of a list |
19 |
> of stuff then, just below that, processor :1 at the top of an |
20 |
> identical list. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Are those two cores? I think CONFIG_MCORE2=y is recommended for the |
23 |
> Atom. Does MCORE2 mean 'two cores' or 'core no.2'? The <help> |
24 |
> window(under Symmetric multi-processor support) says nothing about |
25 |
> 'cores' Are 'cores' and 'cpus' the same thing in this context? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Well, this has taken me all morning and half the afternoon and I |
28 |
> haven't even started 'Power management...' options yet. I'll just say |
29 |
> 'yes' to SMP and carry on. Hopefully have the definitive answer by |
30 |
> midnight and I can make the darn kernel. |
31 |
|
32 |
That is correct, SMP is required to use the multi-core option. |
33 |
Multi-Cores and SMP are not the same thing, but are "basically" the |
34 |
same thing, so the same code handles both. It appears you do have a |
35 |
dual-core CPU, so you should use SMP and the multi-core option in your |
36 |
kernel config. Otherwise you'll only be using half of your processor's |
37 |
ability. |