1 |
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 02:23:55PM +0200, Geralt wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Erik Hahn <erik_hahn@×××.de> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Geralt wrote: |
4 |
> >> Although it would be possible to include this respawning into slim |
5 |
> >> (and I suppose that gdm and kdm have this feature?) it is much more |
6 |
> >> work than checking in xdm is slim is still up and if not restarting it |
7 |
> >> (since xdm is slim's parent process it gets even informed about it, so |
8 |
> >> no polling would be necessary!). |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > xdm isn't slim's parent process, slim is a replacement for xdm. Or do |
11 |
> > you mean the xdm init script? |
12 |
> I meant the xdm init script, since I thought we were talking all the |
13 |
> time about the xdm init script when saying xdm. Did I misunderstand |
14 |
> something in the previous posts? |
15 |
|
16 |
No, I just wasn't absolutely sure. "xdm" was mentioned once as |
17 |
"/etc/init.d/xdm", once someone said something about "a xdm". |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
hackerkey://v4sw5hw2ln3pr5ck0ma2u7LwXm4l7Gi2e2t4b7Ken4/7a16s0r1p-5.62/-6.56g5OR |