From: | hw <hw@×××××.de> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] installing LTSP | ||
Date: | Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:47:09 | ||
Message-Id: | 56E2BE41.2090207@gc-24.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] installing LTSP by Stroller |
1 | Stroller wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | >> On Thu, 10 March 2016, at 5:43 pm, hw <hw@×××××.de> wrote: |
4 | >> |
5 | >>>>> Downloading 'https://launchpad.net/ltsp/ltspfs-trunk/1.1/+download/ltspfs-1.1.tar.xz' |
6 | >> --2016-03-10 18:08:59-- https://launchpad.net/ltsp/ltspfs-trunk/1.1/+download/ltspfs-1.1.tar.xz |
7 | >> ... |
8 | >> |
9 | >> !!! Couldn't download 'ltspfs-1.1.tar.xz'. Aborting. |
10 | > |
11 | > Navigating this Launchpad site confuses me, but it seems like is no longer distributed in this form. |
12 | > |
13 | > Since 2012, the ltsp package has a bunch of 5.x.y releases: https://launchpad.net/ltsp/ltsp-trunk |
14 | > |
15 | > There appear to be no corresponding ltspfs packages: https://launchpad.net/ltsp/ltspfs-trunk |
16 | > |
17 | > Stroller. |
18 | > |
19 | > |
20 | |
21 | Well, I'm thinking about using another distribution instead. |
22 | Fedora doesn't seem to have ltsp packaged, either, only parts |
23 | of it. Debian probaly has it packaged, but I'd have to use |
24 | testing to avoid ancient software as much as possible. Perhaps |
25 | arch is an option ... |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] installing LTSP | "J." <jyo.garcia@×××××.com> |