| 1 |
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2014-02-19 2:04 AM, Daniel Campbell <lists@××××××××.us> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be chosen as |
| 5 |
>> the default. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Ridiculous. Forget about Canek's rant... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This is about *choice*. Also, I would argue the *opposite of what Canek is |
| 10 |
> saying in this last rant... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Tanstaafl, can we please not use terms like "rants"? I'm just giving |
| 13 |
my opinion, trying to be respectful and civil to the others |
| 14 |
participants in this thread. I would appreciate if you do the same to |
| 15 |
me. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> If he and other want systemd profiles, let *them* do the work of creating |
| 18 |
> and maintaining them. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And as I said on [1], I agree; lets have a systemd profile... which |
| 21 |
apparently it basically already exists[2]. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
(I snip the rest, since I don't really disagree with it). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Regards. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/272694 |
| 28 |
[2] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/targets/systemd/ |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 31 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 32 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives