| 1 |
Am Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:07:08 -0600 |
| 2 |
schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com>: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 5 |
[...] |
| 6 |
> > To answer the OPs question correctly... |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Since OpenRC is the *default* - for now at least - it is *king*, and |
| 9 |
> > systemd is the red-headed step-child, and as such OpenRC is and will be |
| 10 |
> > 100% fully supported. |
| 11 |
[...] |
| 12 |
> > With that in mind, it is also 100% on the *systemd proponents* to make |
| 13 |
> > sure that *systemd* is 'fully supported' as an *alternate* init system. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> And that's exactly what's happening... in Gentoo, GNOME officially |
| 16 |
> supports only systemd, not OpenRC. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Who is king again? |
| 19 |
[...] |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I get the distinct feeling that you two should probably read the LWN article |
| 22 |
again. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Marc Joliet |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
"People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we |
| 28 |
don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup |
Archives