Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Varner <fuzzyray@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question regarding trick portage.mask situation
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 02:57:49
Message-Id: 1126752787.18774.2.camel@garath.homelinux.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Question regarding trick portage.mask situation by Matthew Cline
1 On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 21:20 -0400, Matthew Cline wrote:
2 > I've been having serious problems with newer versions of
3 > gentoo-sources (basically 2.6.12-r9 and 2.6.12-r10), so I have
4 > downgraded to 2.6.12-r4, which is rock solid for me. So, I thought to
5 > add something like this atom to /etc/portage/package.mask:
6 >
7 > >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4
8 >
9 > However, what I really want to to is mask all versions of
10 > gentoo-sources greater than 2.6.12-r4 and less than or equal to
11 > 2.6.12-r10, so that I can test newer versions of gentoo-sources beyond
12 > 2.6.12-r10 when they become available. So, what I really want is
13 > something like this:
14 >
15 > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4< >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r10
16 >
17 > Of course, this syntax doesn't work and spits out an "Invalid atom"
18 > error when I run emerge. Does anyone know the proper syntax for what I
19 > want to achieve? Is it even possible to acheive this?
20
21 In /etc/portage/package.mask:
22 >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4
23
24 In /etc/portage/package.unmask
25 >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r10
26
27 Should do what you want.
28
29 Regards,
30 Paul
31 --
32 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Question regarding trick portage.mask situation Matthew Cline <matthew.cline@×××××.com>