From: | Matthew Cline <matthew.cline@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Question regarding trick portage.mask situation | ||
Date: | Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:38:50 | ||
Message-Id: | ff4f69a0050915063073c2fdd@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Question regarding trick portage.mask situation by Paul Varner |
1 | On 9/14/05, Paul Varner <fuzzyray@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > In /etc/portage/package.mask: |
3 | > >sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4 |
4 | > |
5 | > In /etc/portage/package.unmask |
6 | > >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r10 |
7 | > |
8 | |
9 | Thanks for the help. So the atoms in package.unmask are evaluated |
10 | after the atoms in package.mask? |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | Matt |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |