1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 12/18/2012 09:14 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
5 |
> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:39:43 PM IST, Kevin Brandstatter |
6 |
> wrote: On 12/18/2012 05:27 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
7 |
>>>> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 03:41:44 PM IST, J. Roeleveld |
8 |
>>>> wrote: |
9 |
>>>>> On Tue, December 18, 2012 04:44, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
10 |
>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>> <SNIP> |
12 |
>>>>> |
13 |
>>>>>> Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit than the |
14 |
>>>>>> ADSL connection. I am trying to use the fiber connection |
15 |
>>>>>> for all activities except some torrent downloading for |
16 |
>>>>>> which I want to use my ADSL connection. Once I'm able to |
17 |
>>>>>> route through the ADSL gateway, it would be easy for me |
18 |
>>>>>> to setup another ip on eth0 on my machine on which |
19 |
>>>>>> transmission could listen. All traffic on that ip would |
20 |
>>>>>> be routed through ADSL and otherwise the fiber. |
21 |
>>>>> |
22 |
>>>>> Nilesh, |
23 |
>>>>> |
24 |
>>>>> I read that you managed to fix it, but for completenes and, |
25 |
>>>>> if applicable, a different solution would be a router with |
26 |
>>>>> 2 or more WAN-ports that can do the routing for you. Added |
27 |
>>>>> benefit there would be that if the fiber connection dies, |
28 |
>>>>> it would be able to automatically route everything through |
29 |
>>>>> the ADSL. |
30 |
>>>>> |
31 |
>>>>> -- Joost |
32 |
>>>>> |
33 |
>>>>> |
34 |
>>>> |
35 |
>>>> Yeah that solution is always there, but I'm not going for |
36 |
>>>> that since I'm evaluating the fiber connection (a new ISP in |
37 |
>>>> my locality). Won't need the ADSL may be after a month or so |
38 |
>>>> when I'll have unlimited plan on fiber. |
39 |
>>>> |
40 |
>>>> @Pandu, or may be the DSL ISP was down yesterday when I was |
41 |
>>>> trying. |
42 |
>>>> |
43 |
>>>> The problem is not exactly fixed yet, although I'm able to |
44 |
>>>> add static routes on the DDWRT router using route command |
45 |
>>>> (and it is working), there's no way to route all traffic from |
46 |
>>>> a source via the other router. It doesn't have iptables ROUTE |
47 |
>>>> target neither iproute2 support.. is there some other method |
48 |
>>>> do to this using iptables? |
49 |
>>>> |
50 |
>>>> The whole problem would be solved if I could add routes on my |
51 |
>>>> local machine, but that doesn't seem to work. It always goes |
52 |
>>>> via fiber which is the default route. |
53 |
>>>> |
54 |
>>>> The final solution to this problem would be putting in a |
55 |
>>>> Linux machine there. I'm trying to build Gentoo for the |
56 |
>>>> Raspberry Pi which can be used for this task, but stuck at |
57 |
>>>> Python since it won't cross compile. Anyway that's another |
58 |
>>>> topic. |
59 |
>>>> |
60 |
>>>> -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com |
61 |
>>>> |
62 |
> you actually can add routes on a local machine. the real trick |
63 |
> would be to have them pushed from the dd-wrt box so that they dont |
64 |
> have to be manually set each time |
65 |
> |
66 |
> -Kevin |
67 |
>> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> How?? |
70 |
> |
71 |
> -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com |
72 |
> |
73 |
|
74 |
with the route add command. |
75 |
obviously not as clean as an iptables forward rule which is also an option |
76 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
77 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) |
78 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
79 |
|
80 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0KgFAAoJEAwpfz/ORQZCYDwH/0lZMsp+Ncr2kO5iVbuX5Oje |
81 |
3PUuelWA3IxhF7xmRkNoyMZr+A5QGGWajp7JHPHSSJ/k+Iv7h3xYDABgRwm3tSaP |
82 |
S0tM0VwFVLXHukhUo8vWFOqU6vmCrTuhNtiTYehFYXXS2pzc07kG+b27aH1RSKsD |
83 |
6zrha22EbaNe7c4dtdVY4rQ/GtPbpiDjAjvQev0nEreP4uLtwWJmx6V6onlGObGi |
84 |
0v6TVs9dB7fXQh2z5XaYt4BQ1ORqzi0o2ocKTOURJd23kQAXRDfI96+xjG8Bro77 |
85 |
AcaxjXq8bP/W8mdDqFL3w44CF7QDca3uXKAOlGC1Qbm9XVmkETpCQrlzL8aKM0k= |
86 |
=oIGG |
87 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |