| 1 |
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:39:43 PM IST, Kevin Brandstatter wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 12/18/2012 05:27 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 03:41:44 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On Tue, December 18, 2012 04:44, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> <SNIP> |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit than the ADSL |
| 12 |
>>>> connection. I am trying to use the fiber connection for all |
| 13 |
>>>> activities except some torrent downloading for which I want to |
| 14 |
>>>> use my ADSL connection. Once I'm able to route through the ADSL |
| 15 |
>>>> gateway, it would be easy for me to setup another ip on eth0 on |
| 16 |
>>>> my machine on which transmission could listen. All traffic on |
| 17 |
>>>> that ip would be routed through ADSL and otherwise the fiber. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> Nilesh, |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> I read that you managed to fix it, but for completenes and, if |
| 22 |
>>> applicable, a different solution would be a router with 2 or more |
| 23 |
>>> WAN-ports that can do the routing for you. Added benefit there |
| 24 |
>>> would be that if the fiber connection dies, it would be able to |
| 25 |
>>> automatically route everything through the ADSL. |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>>> -- Joost |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
>>> |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> Yeah that solution is always there, but I'm not going for that |
| 32 |
>> since I'm evaluating the fiber connection (a new ISP in my |
| 33 |
>> locality). Won't need the ADSL may be after a month or so when I'll |
| 34 |
>> have unlimited plan on fiber. |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> @Pandu, or may be the DSL ISP was down yesterday when I was |
| 37 |
>> trying. |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> The problem is not exactly fixed yet, although I'm able to add |
| 40 |
>> static routes on the DDWRT router using route command (and it is |
| 41 |
>> working), there's no way to route all traffic from a source via the |
| 42 |
>> other router. It doesn't have iptables ROUTE target neither |
| 43 |
>> iproute2 support.. is there some other method do to this using |
| 44 |
>> iptables? |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
>> The whole problem would be solved if I could add routes on my local |
| 47 |
>> machine, but that doesn't seem to work. It always goes via fiber |
| 48 |
>> which is the default route. |
| 49 |
>> |
| 50 |
>> The final solution to this problem would be putting in a Linux |
| 51 |
>> machine there. I'm trying to build Gentoo for the Raspberry Pi |
| 52 |
>> which can be used for this task, but stuck at Python since it won't |
| 53 |
>> cross compile. Anyway that's another topic. |
| 54 |
>> |
| 55 |
>> -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com |
| 56 |
>> |
| 57 |
> you actually can add routes on a local machine. the real trick would |
| 58 |
> be to have them pushed from the dd-wrt box so that they dont have to |
| 59 |
> be manually set each time |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> - -Kevin |
| 62 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 63 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 64 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 65 |
> |
| 66 |
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0KNXAAoJEAwpfz/ORQZCg4YH/3onXndm8ZrmMd/DhtSYYvMc |
| 67 |
> hZWRBu4qwIbTapqpWPDZ7nniIfrhfCOfc6bD4MNPO0a20RmC35zAZlLkmFEUMgVf |
| 68 |
> iJ/25AjLPhI2I8bnLVHkI6Cq5mcvxugK5FMirdD4B4qG9Vd+oUZEo5R/BEZll7rL |
| 69 |
> 9+RuKozq8c/Zdr+MNu/jEQhPtBjHKH6/vWnznK2U7WraRv9jw6vQIoHaMNi2cxG7 |
| 70 |
> vRaD03sPTy58bgHtn26l9bodITTtXYmCCwQYnKfltIraYkTtZOoOUW81NICdv66l |
| 71 |
> 6Ckow8FrXTLr8zDU9LfAWLTb316cyzTRHU3uX1KXqe0RAv6r1QTZPnRYeR2ix9I= |
| 72 |
> =5g1g |
| 73 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 74 |
> |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
How?? |
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
-- |
| 79 |
Nilesh Govindarajan |
| 80 |
http://nileshgr.com |
Archives