1 |
On Tuesday 05 January 2016 19:09:10 lee wrote: |
2 |
> Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> writes: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 05 January 2016 14:34:38 lee wrote: |
4 |
> >> Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> writes: |
5 |
> >> > On Tuesday 05 January 2016 04:26:20 Dale wrote: |
6 |
> >> >> Howdy, |
7 |
> >> >> |
8 |
> >> >> I was going to try out some of the KDE5 stuff just to see if I'm |
9 |
> >> >> going |
10 |
> >> >> to like it or not. Anyway, I added a BUNCH of stuff to a keywords |
11 |
> >> >> file |
12 |
> >> >> related to KDE and got past that part. I think I got them all. Now |
13 |
> >> >> I |
14 |
> >> > |
15 |
> >> >> get this: |
16 |
> >> > --->8 |
17 |
> >> > |
18 |
> >> > I was afraid to mess up my KDE4 system with KDE5 in some sort of |
19 |
> >> > parallel |
20 |
> >> > fashion, so I found some spare disk space and installed KDE5 into it, |
21 |
> >> > using the kde overlay and the .../desktop/plasma profile. It's much |
22 |
> >> > easier to |
23 |
> >> |
24 |
> >> How did you manage to install that? I tried it yesterday (without the |
25 |
> >> overlays) and found it impossible to resolve the dependency problems, |
26 |
> >> so |
27 |
> >> I ended up installing the 'normal' kde (I'm running out of time). I'd |
28 |
> >> rather switch that over to plasma from the beginning. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I found I needed the overlay. It greatly simplifies the dependencies. It |
31 |
> > still isn't perfect, as changes occur during development, but it's |
32 |
> > definitely well worth having. |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > Here's my current package.keywords: |
35 |
> > [...] |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > I've no doubt that after the next overlay update I'll have to add or |
38 |
> > remove some things. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> It seemed to me that it's daring to try this because it's a work in |
41 |
> progress, and with the overly, it seemed to be even worse. So I went |
42 |
> with the "normal" kde when I found out that plasma it doesn't work. |
43 |
> That's already painful to install. Install on a slow machine, and you |
44 |
> can't even try much simply because it takes too long. |
45 |
|
46 |
That's why I wanted to keep it separate. By building it in a chroot I could |
47 |
forget about it while it was emerging and continue using the main system. |
48 |
|
49 |
> Should I try to upgrade? That might take another day, which I don't |
50 |
> have ... |
51 |
|
52 |
I wouldn't. As you say, it's nowhere near finished yet and it's likely to |
53 |
make an awful mess of your existing setup. |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
Rgds |
57 |
Peter |