1 |
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Grant Edwards |
2 |
<grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On 2010-12-15, Andrea Conti <alyf@××××.net> wrote: |
4 |
>>> E-SATA != SATA !!!! |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Nah. They are *exactly* the same. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Not according to Wikipedia -- it says the electrical specs for eSATA |
9 |
> are different than the specs for "normal" SATA. I've seen that stated |
10 |
> in other places as well. I don't have copies of the two specs, so I |
11 |
> can't say I'm 100%, but I believe the Wikipedia page. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
It is true, and has to be for cost reasons. |
15 |
|
16 |
1) Internal SATA drives are at the end of a single cable and don't |
17 |
require hot-plugging logic be built into the SATA port driver on the |
18 |
SATA controller because they are always powered up. (They are inside |
19 |
the case) |
20 |
|
21 |
2) External SATA drives are at the end of 1) an internal cable, 2) a |
22 |
case SATA-eSATA connector, and 3) an external eSATA cable along with |
23 |
whatever is inside the eSATA case. eSATA compatible ports must include |
24 |
hot-plugging logic. |
25 |
|
26 |
For cost/simplicity reasons chip manufacturers are free to remove |
27 |
hot-plugging logic from any port for which they don't intend eSATA |
28 |
compatibility. |
29 |
|
30 |
The logic and timing of the signals on SATA and eSATA cables is |
31 |
(TTBOMK) intended to be identical. What those signals look like at |
32 |
different places in the cable chain will be different. |
33 |
|
34 |
- Mark |