| 1 |
Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 |
> Petteri Räty schrieb: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>>Rumen Yotov schrieb: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>>>>Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend; |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>>>Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like |
| 13 |
>>>this not listed in the changelog on CVS? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>>ChangeLog only lists changes done in the package folder. package.masking |
| 16 |
>>needs changes only to the package.mask file. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Okay. But it is change to the package, isn't it? I mean, it now |
| 20 |
> behaves differently than it did before. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
True. I don't think it is against the policy to add package.masking |
| 23 |
information to ChangeLogs but devs just don't do it at the moment. This |
| 24 |
is maybe something you could bring up in the gentoo-dev mailing list. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> I guess, I don't agree with this decision - but I further guess, |
| 27 |
> that I'll have to live with it, don't I? |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Well emerge -1 =<pkg>-<masked version> should give you easy access to |
| 31 |
the package.mask reason to help you in the meanwhile. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Regards, |
| 34 |
Petteri |
Archives