| 1 |
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 11:16:36 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> > Does stable portage support the --autounmask option to emerge? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> I use ~amd64 portage so I have supports that feature but what command |
| 7 |
>> do I run today to unmask the version level they will make stable next |
| 8 |
>> week? (For instance 0.7 instead of 0.8) I don't think that feature |
| 9 |
>> looks into the future like that. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The latest version of baselayout is over six weeks old, so I'd go for |
| 12 |
> that. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Life's a crap shoot. (As are all my index futures trades today.) Sounds good. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
Mark |
Archives