Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:34:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1798094.hGOHUqiLf3@m-id.message-center.info | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] how thorough is #emerge --sync? by maxim wexler |
||
| 1 | · maxim wexler <blissfix@×××××.com>: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >>digg2ogg |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > should be dir2ogg |
| 6 | |
| 7 | 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different |
| 8 | version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Alexander Skwar |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Don't SANFORIZE me!! |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? | Darren Kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org> |