Archives
Archives
| From: | Darren Kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Oct 2006 05:55:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200610172253.27152.bulliver@badcomputer.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? by Alexander Skwar |
||
| 1 | Quoth the Alexander Skwar |
| 2 | > · maxim wexler <blissfix@×××××.com>: |
| 3 | > >>digg2ogg |
| 4 | > > |
| 5 | > > should be dir2ogg |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different |
| 8 | > version should be offered, when you "emerge dir2ogg"? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different (ie: |
| 11 | newer) version offered. Good enough? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -d |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | darren kirby :: Part of the problem since 1976 :: http://badcomputer.org |
| 17 | "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." |
| 18 | - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972 |
| 19 | |
| 20 | -- |
| 21 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? | Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |