| 1 |
On Donnerstag, 21. August 2008, Chuck Robey wrote: |
| 2 |
> This email comments on something dealing with an emerge package issue; if |
| 3 |
> this is the wrong list to put that into, let me know, I'll try again. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I'm trying to emerge kde-base/kde-meta. As I ordinarily do with things I |
| 6 |
> know will have lots of dependencies, I ran "emerge --pretend" on it to see |
| 7 |
> if I was all right with the list of dependencies. In this case, one of the |
| 8 |
> items listed was kde-base/kde-i18n-3.5.9. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, |
| 9 |
> but the stuff that says "i18n" is referring to a version that supports a |
| 10 |
> Russian character list. That's truly useless for me (and, I would think, |
| 11 |
> the great majority of users in the USA). What I wanted to ask is, having |
| 12 |
> that file as a default dependency of kde-meta, isn't that hugely wrong? I |
| 13 |
> mean, shouldn't a user have to slect that in, not have it get installed by |
| 14 |
> default? I mean, you should need to have something like that in your USE |
| 15 |
> flags, shouldn't you? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Or, am I getting something wrong in understanding what an app labeled with |
| 18 |
> "i18n" would mean? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
i18n is all kind of 'internationalisation'. Not only russian characters. |
Archives