1 |
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 16:19 -0700, davecode@××××××××××.net wrote: |
3 |
> > Hi, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > We plan to eval Gentoo. We await 2008 final. The comment is, Gentoo |
6 |
> > home page gives no clue about status. Convincing people that Gentoo is |
7 |
> > "alive" becomes tricky because the final is months late and little |
8 |
> > motion on the home page. That's about all most people inspect. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > So bottom line, impressions of Gentoo are going south even before we |
11 |
> > test. |
12 |
|
13 |
> For a start, have a look at "Old Charts" link and create statistics for |
14 |
> new, resolved and fixed bugs. These numbers show clearly that Gentoo is |
15 |
> very alive. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> The statistics here: http://www.gentoo-portage.com/Statistics |
18 |
> also show that the number of packages doesn't stagnate as it would on a |
19 |
> dying distro. |
20 |
|
21 |
The OP has inadvertently given us some valuable feedback, which stands on its |
22 |
own and is irrelevant with the fact that he (like many other non-gentoo |
23 |
users) had mistaken Gentoo for yet-another-binary-distro. Having a user |
24 |
friendly website that also caters to the needs of newcomers to the Gentoo |
25 |
scene, requires that the key features and benefits of Gentoo are easily |
26 |
visible/accessible. Not many people will navigate to hidden Statistics pages |
27 |
to draw their own conclusions. These could be users that one day prove |
28 |
valuable contributors. I suggest that we spring clean the website and |
29 |
consider our new visitors needs at the same time (plus things like the much |
30 |
asked for Documentation search field?). ;-) |
31 |
|
32 |
Just my 2c's. |
33 |
-- |
34 |
Regards, |
35 |
Mick |