1 |
On 2011-08-01, BRM <bm_witness@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>>>> I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :) |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> I wouldn't. While LibreOffice may have some advances at the moment, |
6 |
>>> I'm still interested in following main-line OOo - now being setting |
7 |
>>> under Apache. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> So you don't use the gentoo OOo ebuilds?? AFAICT, they're a lot closer |
10 |
>> to being libreoffice than to being mainline OOo. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>>> Please do not force us to convert from OO to LO. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> If you use the gentoo ebuilds, then you mostly already have. |
15 |
>> Gentoo OOo? = OOo + Go-Oo |
16 |
>> LibreOffice = OOo + Go-Oo |
17 |
> |
18 |
> There's other stuff in LibreOffice too. But I'd still much rather be |
19 |
> using OOo than LibreOffice. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> And I'd rather drop the GO-OOo patches, but I don't think there's an |
22 |
> option for that in emerge. |
23 |
|
24 |
Not that I've noticed. |
25 |
|
26 |
>>> I have no problem with separate installs for each, but there will be |
27 |
>>> those (like me) that want the official OO installs. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> But, what you get using the Gentoo ebuilds isn't the official OOo |
30 |
>> install. If you're running official OOo, then youre not using the |
31 |
>> Gentoo ebuilds, so why do you care what those ebuilds produce? |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> One of the things I like about LibreOffice is the reduced |
34 |
>> dependancies. Even with the gnome USE flag turned off, OOo pulls in |
35 |
>> some big gnome dependancies that I don't want.? WTF does an office |
36 |
>> suite need libgweather? |
37 |
> |
38 |
> And I'm sure the Apache OO guys will fix that in due time as well. |
39 |
> |
40 |
> All I'm saying is that I want to stick with the Apache OOo in the |
41 |
> long run, not LibreOffice. |
42 |
|
43 |
And what I'm saying is that if you're using the Gentoo ebuilds, you |
44 |
abandoned official OOo a long time ago and are already a ways down the |
45 |
road that LO is taking. |
46 |
|
47 |
If you want to stick with Apache OOo, that's cool. |
48 |
|
49 |
However, the old OOo ebuilds were a long ways from the official branch |
50 |
of OOo before LO came along. So, for people who want to stick with |
51 |
Apache OOo, it doesn't matter that the old OOo ebuilds are being |
52 |
dropped. |
53 |
|
54 |
> Users can switch to the LibreOffice install if they desire, but |
55 |
> there's no reason for force those that want to continue with OOo to |
56 |
> move over. |
57 |
|
58 |
I'm not saying they should be forced to, but it seems like they're |
59 |
fooling themselves if they think that the old Gentoo OOo ebuilds were |
60 |
closer to "official OOo" than to LO. That's probably why the old OOo |
61 |
ebuilds are being dropped -- they're mostly redundant now that LO has |
62 |
come along and incorporated GoOo patches. |
63 |
|
64 |
-- |
65 |
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I wish I was on a |
66 |
at Cincinnati street corner |
67 |
gmail.com holding a clean dog! |