1 |
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:02:50 +0100, Anthony Metcalf wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Well, exactly. That is the theory. I want to know the likelihood of |
4 |
> success. I know that using mtune=k6-2 means it won't run on anything |
5 |
> before a k6-2, and most likely not on anything Intel, due to the |
6 |
> symbols and optimisations used. What I want is some idea of the chance |
7 |
> it will run on a *later* AMD processor. Will an Athlon honour the k6-2 |
8 |
> optimisations? |
9 |
|
10 |
If you have the time before the transition, you could set CFLAGS to |
11 |
something really generic, like -mcpu=i586 and emerge -e system, as well |
12 |
as recompiling the kernel. Then move the disks over. That way, you'll |
13 |
know that your toolchain and portage will work, which is all you need to |
14 |
get everything else going. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Neil Bothwick |
19 |
|
20 |
If a book about failures doesn't sell, is it a success? |