| 1 |
Nagatoro wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:41:14 -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>>Assuming it's the gcc-3.4.5-r1 update you're considering postponing, |
| 11 |
>>>you could just: |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>># echo '>sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5' >> /etc/portage/package.mask |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>>and just remove that line when you're ready to upgrade. It's a *far* |
| 16 |
>>>better idea than trying to modify your profile. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>echo '=sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1' >> /etc/portage/package.mask is better if you only want to postpone this upgrade. Your suggestion blocks all future upgrades. |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
>Why don't upgrade? As far as I know upgrading gcc isn't a big deal. It |
| 26 |
>was just the 3.3.x -> 3.4.x that was due to that the api for c++ had |
| 27 |
>changed. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Oh, I thought it was a big deal. That's why I was wanting to wait. |
| 32 |
Funny thing is, it don't want to upgrade now so maybe it had a bug and |
| 33 |
they set it back again or something, or I just missed it and upgraded |
| 34 |
anyway. ;-) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
:-) |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives