1 |
On 2008-05-12, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> A curiosity: by itself, the Hawking USB adapter has more or |
4 |
>> less sensitivity than the simple Airport glued to my Macbook |
5 |
>> motherboard? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I think it depends a lot on the maturity of the drivers. As I |
8 |
> said, my Netgear PCI card uses the madwifi drivers and vastly |
9 |
> outperforms the Hawking adapter. |
10 |
|
11 |
What do you mean by "outperform"? I can see how drivers can |
12 |
affect throughput. The Windows drivers for my Laptop's WiFi |
13 |
chipset (Intel Pro-something) only get about 1/4 of the |
14 |
bandwidth that the Linux drivers do. |
15 |
|
16 |
But, I don't understand how the driver can affect receiver |
17 |
sensitivity. That's purely a function of the design of the RF |
18 |
frontend. |
19 |
|
20 |
> The Hawking's drivers are fairly new (rt2x00) and madwifi has |
21 |
> been around for quite a while now. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I do have another rt2x00 adapter that performs noticeably |
24 |
> worse than the Hawking. It's a Linksys and it has no external |
25 |
> antenna. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Zippy's brain cells |
29 |
at are straining to bridge |
30 |
visi.com synapses ... |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |