1 |
On 5 Feb 2009, at 23:03, Saphirus Sage wrote: |
2 |
>> ... |
3 |
>> Man pages are notoriously bad. The gentoo handbook and other official |
4 |
>> docs are great OTOH. |
5 |
>> |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Man pages notoriously bad?! Now that's a stance I can hardly |
8 |
> understand, |
9 |
> they've always been a godsend in my experience! Just practice using a |
10 |
> command a few times, look through the options and learn it in the |
11 |
> period |
12 |
> of ten minutes, and a man page has done its purpose. If this stance is |
13 |
> due to your own inadequate ability to read technical documents, then |
14 |
> do |
15 |
> not apply the lacking to anything but your own capacity for |
16 |
> comprehension. |
17 |
|
18 |
To be fair there is an "art" to reading manpages. |
19 |
|
20 |
Manpages tend to be terse yet authoritative, but it was only after |
21 |
(perhaps) a couple of years of using Unix (and perhaps longer) that I |
22 |
learned to appreciate them. |
23 |
|
24 |
I think manpages tend to assume that the reader is already proficient |
25 |
with Unix and often that the reader is familiar with regular |
26 |
expressions. They tend to use the academic language of computer |
27 |
science which may be completely baffling to someone who is technically |
28 |
& logically very competent but self-taught. |
29 |
|
30 |
My experience is that only after learning the syntax of manpages (is |
31 |
that itself documented?) do I find most of them tremendously easy to |
32 |
navigate to find the one specific option I'm looking for. |
33 |
|
34 |
Stroller. |