1 |
Sounds like a ebuild dependency bug, or possibly a bad mix of stable and |
2 |
non-stable packages that haven't been sussed out fully. |
3 |
|
4 |
Not a good long-term solution, especially if you're forgetful like me, but |
5 |
as a test you might try creating a symlink for libapack.so.0 pointing to |
6 |
libapack.so.3 and see if octave runs. |
7 |
|
8 |
Best to remove that more or less right away but it might get you through a |
9 |
test period waiting for the ebuild to get fixed. |
10 |
|
11 |
- Mark |
12 |
|
13 |
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 6:59 AM Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
14 |
|
15 |
> On Thursday, 6 February 2020 13:44:22 GMT karl@××××××××.se wrote: |
16 |
> > Mick: |
17 |
> > ... |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > > I don't have these packages on my systems to check, but does 'eselect |
20 |
> > > lapack list' reveal anything amiss? |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > ... |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > $ eselect lapack list |
25 |
> > Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: |
26 |
> > (none found) |
27 |
> > Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: |
28 |
> > (none found) |
29 |
> > $ eselect blas list |
30 |
> > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: |
31 |
> > (none found) |
32 |
> > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: |
33 |
> > (none found) |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > and after rebuilding lapack with eselect-ldso |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > $ eselect lapack list |
38 |
> > Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: |
39 |
> > (none found) |
40 |
> > Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: |
41 |
> > [1] reference * |
42 |
> > $ eselect blas list |
43 |
> > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: |
44 |
> > (none found) |
45 |
> > Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: |
46 |
> > [1] reference * |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> > still same problem. |
49 |
> > |
50 |
> > recompiling octave, same problem. |
51 |
> > recompiling octave with static-libs, same problem. |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > Regards, |
54 |
> > /Karl Hammar |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Unless someone shows up with more knowledge on the specifics it would be |
57 |
> worth |
58 |
> posting a bug, or contacting the maintainer for suggestions. |
59 |
> -- |
60 |
> Regards, |
61 |
> |
62 |
> Mick |