| 1 |
On Thursday, 6 February 2020 13:44:22 GMT karl@××××××××.se wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mick: |
| 3 |
> ... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I don't have these packages on my systems to check, but does 'eselect |
| 6 |
> > lapack list' reveal anything amiss? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> ... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> $ eselect lapack list |
| 11 |
> Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: |
| 12 |
> (none found) |
| 13 |
> Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: |
| 14 |
> (none found) |
| 15 |
> $ eselect blas list |
| 16 |
> Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: |
| 17 |
> (none found) |
| 18 |
> Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: |
| 19 |
> (none found) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> and after rebuilding lapack with eselect-ldso |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> $ eselect lapack list |
| 24 |
> Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: |
| 25 |
> (none found) |
| 26 |
> Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: |
| 27 |
> [1] reference * |
| 28 |
> $ eselect blas list |
| 29 |
> Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: |
| 30 |
> (none found) |
| 31 |
> Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: |
| 32 |
> [1] reference * |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> still same problem. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> recompiling octave, same problem. |
| 37 |
> recompiling octave with static-libs, same problem. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Regards, |
| 40 |
> /Karl Hammar |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Unless someone shows up with more knowledge on the specifics it would be worth |
| 43 |
posting a bug, or contacting the maintainer for suggestions. |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Regards, |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Mick |
Archives