| 1 |
Mick: |
| 2 |
... |
| 3 |
> I don't have these packages on my systems to check, but does 'eselect lapack |
| 4 |
> list' reveal anything amiss? |
| 5 |
... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
$ eselect lapack list |
| 8 |
Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: |
| 9 |
(none found) |
| 10 |
Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: |
| 11 |
(none found) |
| 12 |
$ eselect blas list |
| 13 |
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: |
| 14 |
(none found) |
| 15 |
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: |
| 16 |
(none found) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
and after rebuilding lapack with eselect-ldso |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
$ eselect lapack list |
| 21 |
Available LAPACK (lib) candidates: |
| 22 |
(none found) |
| 23 |
Available LAPACK (lib64) candidates: |
| 24 |
[1] reference * |
| 25 |
$ eselect blas list |
| 26 |
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib) candidates: |
| 27 |
(none found) |
| 28 |
Available BLAS/CBLAS (lib64) candidates: |
| 29 |
[1] reference * |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
still same problem. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
recompiling octave, same problem. |
| 34 |
recompiling octave with static-libs, same problem. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
/Karl Hammar |
Archives