| 1 |
On Thursday, 6 February 2020 08:28:05 GMT karl@××××××××.se wrote: |
| 2 |
> Octave won't run since a lib is missing. |
| 3 |
> I can re-emerge it without problems, but the problem still |
| 4 |
> persist. The lib is there but it has a different version. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Anyone know what this is about ? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> $ ldd /usr/bin/octave-cli-4.2.2 | grep not |
| 9 |
> liblapack.so.0 => not found |
| 10 |
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/liblapack.* |
| 11 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 May 9 2019 /usr/lib64/liblapack.a -> |
| 12 |
> lapack/reference/liblapack.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 29 00:30 |
| 13 |
> /usr/lib64/liblapack.so -> liblapack.so.3 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 |
| 14 |
> Nov 29 00:30 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3 -> liblapack.so.3.8.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 |
| 15 |
> root root 6886896 Nov 29 00:29 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so.3.8.0 |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Regards, |
| 18 |
> /Karl Hammar |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I don't have these packages on my systems to check, but does 'eselect lapack |
| 21 |
list' reveal anything amiss? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Otherwise the latest sci-libs/lapack is 3.8.0, so your links above look |
| 24 |
correct as far as I can tell. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Regards, |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Mick |
Archives