1 |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 02:40:15PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 30/10/2013 04:32, Dale wrote: |
4 |
> > Howdy, |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Quick question. I have a Nvidia GeForce GT 220 video card. It has a |
7 |
> > VGA and a HDMI connection. My question, if I hook a monitor to each |
8 |
> > port, they will both have the same pic right? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Depends on the card. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It might have two "processors"[1], one for each output then it will be |
13 |
> dual-head and you can have different output to each. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Or it might have one "processor" and two outputs coming from the same |
16 |
> place. That's the same picture on both, call this dual-screen if you will. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> ignore what Google says. Read the actual nVidia spec sheet, that tells |
19 |
> you what you really have. |
20 |
|
21 |
Well, even the teensie bitty graphics inside my netbook can manage two |
22 |
separate screens between which windows can be moved around, albeit with |
23 |
limited pixel count (1400x1050 is the maximum for external monitor). |
24 |
I can't imagine there's anything weaker on the graphics market these |
25 |
days than an Atom IGP from a few years ago. |
26 |
|
27 |
That's within a single xorg session though, I never tried separate xorgs |
28 |
per output. |
29 |
|
30 |
$ xrandr --output LVDS --auto --primary --output VGA --left-of LVDS --auto |
31 |
would give me two screens, the primary on the internal screen and on the |
32 |
VGA output the second one which is logically placed left of the internal |
33 |
picture. |
34 |
-- |
35 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
36 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any Facebook service. |
37 |
|
38 |
Which animal can add? An Octoplus. |