| 1 |
Am Sonntag, 17. Juni 2012, 17:33:58 schrieb Michael Mol: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 17/06/12 22:36, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:52:48AM -0500, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >>> In my humble opinion, you should use whatever you actually like. You |
| 7 |
> >>> don't like GNOME? Then don't use it; and if you used it before and |
| 8 |
> >>> don't like the new version, either get involver to get it "fixed" (for |
| 9 |
> >>> whatever defintion of "fixed" you want), fork it (although maybe you |
| 10 |
> >>> should first try Unity, MATE, or Cinnamon before), or go to another |
| 11 |
> >>> desktop. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> My attitude towards KDE and GNOME is "the pox on both their houses"; I |
| 14 |
> >> don't run desktops, I run applications. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > It's just that most people prefer a unified look and feel, rather than |
| 17 |
> > each |
| 18 |
> > application inventing the same things in a different and incompatible way. |
| 19 |
> > This is why DEs are so popular. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> We had a unified look and feel...but nobody liked that particular Motif. ;) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
and it wasn't even that unified. And certainly not the feel with every |
| 24 |
application reacting differently to some keypress. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
#163933 |
Archives