1 |
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 17/06/12 22:36, Walter Dnes wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:52:48AM -0500, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> In my humble opinion, you should use whatever you actually like. You |
7 |
>>> don't like GNOME? Then don't use it; and if you used it before and |
8 |
>>> don't like the new version, either get involver to get it "fixed" (for |
9 |
>>> whatever defintion of "fixed" you want), fork it (although maybe you |
10 |
>>> should first try Unity, MATE, or Cinnamon before), or go to another |
11 |
>>> desktop. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> My attitude towards KDE and GNOME is "the pox on both their houses"; I |
15 |
>> don't run desktops, I run applications. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> It's just that most people prefer a unified look and feel, rather than each |
19 |
> application inventing the same things in a different and incompatible way. |
20 |
> This is why DEs are so popular. |
21 |
|
22 |
We had a unified look and feel...but nobody liked that particular Motif. ;) |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
:wq |