| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Paul Hartman |
| 3 |
> <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> <SNIP> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> I think the only way we'lll see 500MB/sec on that SSD is to buy a |
| 7 |
>> motherboard which has a SATA3 controller as its primary on-board drive |
| 8 |
>> controller and plug it in to that. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Look on the bright side, someday when we upgrade our motherboards, |
| 11 |
>> it'll be like we got a free SSD upgrade for our troubles. :) |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Support for your POV Paul: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> http://techgage.com/article/battle_of_the_sata_30_controllers/ |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> My controller is also a Marvell and the machine is X58-based so |
| 19 |
> results are likely to be similar. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I'm likely fighting a losing battle here, but I'll keep fighting for |
| 22 |
> awhile longer... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Cheers, |
| 25 |
> Mark |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
One additional thought: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
This limitation is likely just a byproduct of using a 1 lane |
| 30 |
controller. If one was willing to spend a (fairly large) bit more one |
| 31 |
could get a 16 lane SATA3 controller and would likely do much better |
| 32 |
in terms of throughput... |
Archives