| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >> You've made an assumption there. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Maybe my assumption isn't true, after all seeing the list for firefox |
| 6 |
> > that Matthew pointed to, although with firefox we don't see upgrades so |
| 7 |
> > often, I guess we should *not* feel more secure with it... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> The noscript firefox addon gives significant protection with only a |
| 10 |
> little inconvenience. There was no equivalent for chromium last time I |
| 11 |
> checked, and it still doesn't have a master password to protect saved |
| 12 |
> webform passwords. Chromium is faster than a pgo build of firefox so i |
| 13 |
> would prefer to use it, but not until those two issues are addressed. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
I felt the same way, but then I found NotScript [0]. It's decent, I do like |
| 17 |
noscript a bit better, but it gets the job done. I can't recall anything |
| 18 |
about a master password, though, so that may still be a valid concern. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
0. |
| 21 |
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/odjhifogjcknibkahlpidmdajjpkkcfn |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Matthew Finkel |
Archives