| 1 |
On Tuesday 22 Nov 2005 4:23 am, Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 2 |
> Just because you have a lot of packages installed that have the "pam" USE |
| 3 |
> flag doesn't mean that much-- is the flag actually enabled for those |
| 4 |
> packages? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If so, and your system is not having any issues, I wouldn't necessarily |
| 7 |
> become hysterical just yet. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
I did a emerge -pv for all those packages and looks like all of them are |
| 10 |
actually using PAM. What I am thinking now is to mask any accidental update |
| 11 |
of PAM in package.mask and hope that it doesn't get messed up |
| 12 |
"just_like_that". |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Thanks for the help. |
| 15 |
Abhay |
Archives