1 |
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:13:53 +0200 |
3 |
> Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@×××.de> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Hi, |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 13:56:44 schrieb Alex Schuster: |
8 |
>> > Alan McKinnon writes: |
9 |
>> > > On Tue 23 August 2011 18:17:17 Stroller did opine thusly: |
10 |
>> > > > On 23 August 2011, at 07:27, Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
11 |
>> > [...] |
12 |
>> > |
13 |
>> > > > > And I don't really see the point of D-BUS on a server either. |
14 |
>> > > > > All the services that need to talk to each other already have |
15 |
>> > > > > working communication paths. |
16 |
>> > > > |
17 |
>> > > > Reading that blog entry I found discouraging the idea that dbus |
18 |
>> > > > might be required on my servers in the future, if systemd |
19 |
>> > > > becomes popular with distros. |
20 |
>> > > |
21 |
>> > > What's your objection to dbus? It gives you a standard message |
22 |
>> > > bus, is small, light, consumes minimal resources and provides a |
23 |
>> > > nice standard way to do IPC. Probably easier than reinventing the |
24 |
>> > > wheel with named pipes and other bits over and over. |
25 |
>> > |
26 |
>> > Except for me. dbus-daemon often uses 10-20% of my CPU according to |
27 |
>> > top. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> Mine idles most of the time, no CPU is used. My computer is running |
30 |
>> for ~6h now, dbus-daemon used less than 1.5s CPU time. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> > And |
33 |
>> > this morning, it was using about 750M of memory. Which is less than |
34 |
>> > kwin's and Kontact's usage, but still. |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> Strange. Mine uses only ~20MB. |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> > But I think the problem is on my side, I run KDE4 with only 8G of |
39 |
>> > memory, no wonder I need 1.7G of swap right now. |
40 |
>> > </rant> |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> I have only 4GB of memory, run kde4, swap is not used at all most of |
43 |
>> the time. There are still ~512MB free with ~1,3GB cached currently. |
44 |
>> I do have programs running :) firefox with some tabs, kdevelop with a |
45 |
>> project (~100.000 LOC), kmail, LibreOffice and 3 konsoles, each with |
46 |
>> some tabs open. I know, I am of no help at all, but I really wonder, |
47 |
>> why your numbers differ so significantly from mine. |
48 |
> |
49 |
> He probably has the same problem as I - something badly wrong in the |
50 |
> roll-your-own config. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> I had a 4G Dell laptop where KDE would start and instantly consume at |
53 |
> least 1.5G just for it's various bits. Akonadi, Nepomuk, Virtuoso were |
54 |
> the usual culprits. Oddly, dbus would often rise to 700M (!). And |
55 |
> forget about actually emerging something - the first sniff that gcc was |
56 |
> running and the machine would thrash like mad and 4G swap would fill up |
57 |
> in no time at all. Less sweap wasn't an option - the battery is dud so |
58 |
> I needed hibernate. |
59 |
> |
60 |
> Sadly (or not, depending on your viewpoint), that machine died on |
61 |
> Monday morning - suspect graphics card. I can't complain - it ran flat |
62 |
> out 24/7/365 and I treated it like one of the servers that I could |
63 |
> carry around. So I can't even troubleshoot what I configured how to |
64 |
> make performance behave like it did. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> Happily, there was a nice pretty lady from Samsung in the office 3 |
67 |
> months ago wanting to sell the 900X Macbook Air knock-off into the |
68 |
> company. The IT manager didn't know what to do with the demo she left |
69 |
> behind so I knicked it for myself (sans paperwork of course. Makes it |
70 |
> easier to prolong how long it takes to test properly) and it's running |
71 |
> Ubuntu. Memory issues are a thing of the past and everything behaves |
72 |
> just like it should. Even <gasp> flash. |
73 |
|
74 |
That saddens me a little. Of all the friends and coworkers I have, I'm |
75 |
the only one left using Gentoo. All of them switched to Fedora, or |
76 |
Ubuntu, or OpenSuSE. |
77 |
|
78 |
My three years old laptop runs up-to-date Gentoo with systemd, plus |
79 |
the GNOME overlay so I can use GNOME 3. Absolutely everything works |
80 |
with the laptop: the Wi-Fi with NetworkManager, the sound with |
81 |
PulseAudio, suspend/resume, all the Fn keys, wathever. Even the |
82 |
ridiculous touchstrip fingerprint sensor, though I don't really use |
83 |
it. |
84 |
|
85 |
Even more: every damn GUI program does what it should, so even though |
86 |
I'm able to configure and use everything with the command line, I |
87 |
don't have to, because I can use the pretty graphic programs... if at |
88 |
all, 'cause nowadays everything usually "just works". And the same |
89 |
it's true for all my other machines. |
90 |
|
91 |
But I'm also aware that all of this is possible because I have the |
92 |
knowledge (and the patience) to detect and fix any problem that I may |
93 |
encounter when updating my machine. I don't need a robust QA from my |
94 |
distribution, but I'm the exception. And this is the kind of QA |
95 |
problems that make people to replace Gentoo for Ubuntu, or Fedora, or |
96 |
whatever. |
97 |
|
98 |
I whish I knew how to solve this so everybody could use Gentoo, but I |
99 |
don't. I don't think I will ever use any other distro (although I've |
100 |
toyed with the idea of trying exherbo), but I cannot in good |
101 |
conscience recommend it to "normal" users, unless I'm willing to be |
102 |
their tech support forever. |
103 |
|
104 |
I love Gentoo, been using it since 2004, but I'm the first one to |
105 |
admit it's not for everyone. |
106 |
|
107 |
And that saddens me a little. |
108 |
-- |
109 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
110 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
111 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |