| 1 |
On Donnerstag 16 Juli 2009, Keith Dart wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:25:06 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > sure. Support companies that don't care about open source drivers. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I also use boards with Intel embedded graphics chips. :-) They also have |
| 8 |
> a strong open-source effort. In fact, I think they have the best |
| 9 |
> open-source driver support in the industry. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
yeah? look at phoronix again. Their current drivers are completly fucked up. |
| 13 |
Plus no drivers for Pulsbo' chips. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> > And remember: when Nvidia fucks up their drivers (look at nvnews for |
| 16 |
> > people out of luck) you are screwed. With AMD the work on the open |
| 17 |
> > drivers is nicely going forward - so you will be able to choose. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Perhaps "never" is too harsh. When AMD chips have full support of |
| 20 |
> features in open-source drivers for the Xorg server that are |
| 21 |
> stable and fast without any 32-bitness then perhaps I will reconsider. |
| 22 |
> But I don't expect that to happen any time soon. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
again: there is no '32 bitness'. As bridgeman explained in the thread I sent |
| 25 |
you the link to. |
Archives