Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Jörg Schaible" <joerg.schaible@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:57:32
Message-Id: herrob$o95$1@ger.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: FIXED: Re: KDE3 removal by Alan McKinnon
1 Alan McKinnon wrote:
2
3 > On Saturday 28 November 2009 13:59:38 Jörg Schaible wrote:
4 >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
5 >> > On Friday 27 November 2009 23:07:25 Jörg Schaible wrote:
6 >> >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
7 >> >> > On Thursday 26 November 2009 19:34:34 James wrote:
8 >> >> >> kde-4.3.1 went smooth, except
9 >> >> >> for I have to manually removed all the kde-3.5 packages.
10 >> >> >> It had kde-meta-3.5.10. Is there some syntax or a better
11 >> >> >> method to insure all the kde-3.5.x packages are removed,
12 >> >> >> without a manual sweep?
13 >> >> >
14 >> >> > grep kde /var/lib/portage/world
15 >> >> > and eyeball the output. There should only be -meta packages, and
16 >> >> > individual packages for which you have NOT installed the -meta
17 >> >> > package, in there. vi the world file and remove the stuff that
18 >> >> > shouldn't be there, then
19 >> >> >
20 >> >> > emerge -C <all-kde3.5-meta-packages-in-world> && emerge -a
21 >> >> > --depclean
22 >> >>
23 >> >> as alternative simply append to all kde-base/* packages in world :4.3
24 >> >> and do then a depclean ;-)
25 >> >
26 >> > Which promptly defeats the ENTIRE purpose of a world file and -meta
27 >> > packages.
28 >>
29 >> a) I've never used the meta packages, but selected my KDE apps on purpose
30 >
31 > You missed the part where the user clearly states earlier that he DOES use
32 > -meta packages. With that in mind, any advice you give should be aligned
33 > to the fact that he is a -meta user
34 >
35 >> b) it's a lot easier this way to get rid of the KDE 3 stuff, however you
36 >> should get drop of the slot again after depclean has been finished
37 >
38 > How is it easier? You have to maintain the SLOTs in world yourself because
39 > the instant you do that portage will not automagically offer to upgrade
40 > anymore (upgrades within the same slot excepted). And --depclean will NOT
41 > adjust your SLOTs in world when it's finished. I can't really make sense
42 > of your last sentence but that is what you seem to imply
43
44 Yes, that's what I've said. Drop the slot again after depclean has finished.
45 Exactly because of the upgrades.
46
47 >> > If that's how you want to admin your box,
48 >>
49 >> I am using long enough Gentoo that I remember very well the times when
50 >> portage destroyed the world file completely.
51 >
52 > That was long ago and no longer applicable. That bug in portage got fixed,
53 > so a behaviour on your part to compensate for a bug that is not there is
54 > outdated behaviour.
55 >
56 >> And regenworld put *anything*
57 >> into world at that time. Therefore I know very well, what should be in
58 >> this file and what not. There's no magic.
59 >
60 > Yes, the only things in world are packages you want that are not
61 > dependencies of something else already in world. You are advising the user
62 > to put the dependencies of -meta packages into world
63
64 No. I adviced him to add :4.3 to all kde-base/* packages that *are* in
65 world.
66
67 > when the -meta
68 > package is already there.
69
70 It does not matter in this case if the package is -meta or not.
71
72 >
73 > And that is plain silly
74 >
75 >> > can I recommend you switch to
76 >> > sabayon instead?
77 >>
78 >> ROFL! So, you mean, if users get too smart, Gentoo is no longer their
79 >> distribution? Don't be silly.
80 >
81 > Erm, you should read the whole thread and realise the bits you missed -
82 > the bits that make your statements nonsensical
83
84 All I did, was offering an alternative method to get rid of KDE 3 using
85 depclean without the need to identify every package individually.
86
87 Feel free to ignore it.
88
89 - Jörg