1 |
On 16/09/14 20:07, James wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> By now many are familiar with my keen interest in clustering gentoo |
5 |
> systems. So, what most cluster technologies use is a distributed file |
6 |
> system on top of the local (HD/SDD) file system. Naturally not |
7 |
> all file systems, particularly the distributed file systems, have |
8 |
> straightforward instructions. Also, an device file system, such as |
9 |
> XFS and a distibuted (on top of the device file system) combination |
10 |
> may not work very well when paired. So a variety of testing is |
11 |
> something I'm researching. Eliminiation of either file system |
12 |
> listed below, due to Gentoo User Experience is most welcome information, |
13 |
> as well as tips and tricks to setting up any file system. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Distributed File Systems (DFS): |
17 |
> HDFS (poor performance) |
18 |
> Lustre |
19 |
> Ceph |
20 |
> XtreemFS |
21 |
> GlusterFS |
22 |
> MooseFS |
23 |
> FhGFS (BeeGFS) soon to be entirely open sourced? |
24 |
> Any other distributed file systems I should consider using? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Local (Device) File Systems LFS: |
27 |
> btrfs |
28 |
> zfs |
29 |
> ext4 |
30 |
> xfs |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Obviously I do not what to test all combinations of DFS/LocalFS |
33 |
> so your comments are extremely welcome as is any and all |
34 |
> related information. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> James |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
howdy, |
40 |
you might also like to see about GFS2, OCFS and OrangeFS. |
41 |
GFS2 for me was major effort to get going on gentoo, OCFS worked almost |
42 |
out of the box, but is from oracle. |
43 |
in all cases writes were the biggest hurdle for me due to the |
44 |
distributed lock mechanisms |
45 |
ymmv |