Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: thegeezer <thegeezer@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] File system testing
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:47:43
Message-Id: 54247F46.1050008@thegeezer.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] File system testing by James
1 On 16/09/14 20:07, James wrote:
2 > Hello,
3 >
4 > By now many are familiar with my keen interest in clustering gentoo
5 > systems. So, what most cluster technologies use is a distributed file
6 > system on top of the local (HD/SDD) file system. Naturally not
7 > all file systems, particularly the distributed file systems, have
8 > straightforward instructions. Also, an device file system, such as
9 > XFS and a distibuted (on top of the device file system) combination
10 > may not work very well when paired. So a variety of testing is
11 > something I'm researching. Eliminiation of either file system
12 > listed below, due to Gentoo User Experience is most welcome information,
13 > as well as tips and tricks to setting up any file system.
14 >
15 >
16 > Distributed File Systems (DFS):
17 > HDFS (poor performance)
18 > Lustre
19 > Ceph
20 > XtreemFS
21 > GlusterFS
22 > MooseFS
23 > FhGFS (BeeGFS) soon to be entirely open sourced?
24 > Any other distributed file systems I should consider using?
25 >
26 > Local (Device) File Systems LFS:
27 > btrfs
28 > zfs
29 > ext4
30 > xfs
31 >
32 > Obviously I do not what to test all combinations of DFS/LocalFS
33 > so your comments are extremely welcome as is any and all
34 > related information.
35 >
36 > James
37 >
38 >
39 howdy,
40 you might also like to see about GFS2, OCFS and OrangeFS.
41 GFS2 for me was major effort to get going on gentoo, OCFS worked almost
42 out of the box, but is from oracle.
43 in all cases writes were the biggest hurdle for me due to the
44 distributed lock mechanisms
45 ymmv