| 1 |
> On 16 Sep 2017, at 17:16, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday, 16 September 2017 15:35:44 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> What really got up my nose, as mentioned above, was doing an emerge -s on |
| 5 |
>> thing-provisioning-tools and getting told it was "tools for thin |
| 6 |
>> provisioning". |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I raised a bug report about that once, against use.desc. There was a flurry |
| 9 |
> of activity as devs looked around their own bailiwicks and fixed them, then |
| 10 |
> everything went quiet again. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Really? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I started threads at least twice on gentoo-dev (now years ago), and it seemed to have no effect. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I've given up expecting USE descriptions to be useful. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> It's an example of no designer or coder enjoying any of the still important |
| 19 |
> bits left over when the acceptance test is passed. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+1 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Stroller. |
Archives