| 1 |
Tried it one FS to test - looked good |
| 2 |
tried it on a few file systems - seemed to take punishment that killed |
| 3 |
the ext2/3 FS every time |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Then every one died within a month with unrecoverable errors of one type |
| 6 |
or another (power crash caused corruption that couldnt be fixed, unknown |
| 7 |
problems, long standing bugs, certain files that couldnt be stored on |
| 8 |
the system, emerge failures when /var was on btrfs (libreoffice was the |
| 9 |
worst), ...) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
At this point in time I have the same opinion of it as I have for |
| 12 |
ext2/3/4 - crap ... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Maybe in the fullness of time |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
BillK |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 21:31 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 20 |
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:12:35 +0200, Jarry wrote: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> > Really no fsck? I've heard fedora was going to use btrfs |
| 23 |
> > as main filesystem in upcomming release 16 (to be released |
| 24 |
> > in about a month). How could they do it without fsck? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> They can't, that's why they've postponed it until until 17. Btrfs will be |
| 27 |
> in 16, but not as the default filesystem. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
Archives