Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:04:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110921213159.1bc81d19@zaphod.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough? by Jarry |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:12:35 +0200, Jarry wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Really no fsck? I've heard fedora was going to use btrfs |
| 4 | > as main filesystem in upcomming release 16 (to be released |
| 5 | > in about a month). How could they do it without fsck? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | They can't, that's why they've postponed it until until 17. Btrfs will be |
| 8 | in 16, but not as the default filesystem. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Neil Bothwick |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Top Oxymorons Number 31: Small crowd |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is Btrfs "stable" enough? | William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> |