Archives
Archives
| From: | "David M. Fellows" <fellows@×××.ca> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o, Meino.Cramer@×××.de | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Record sizes of directories of a directory tree (huge) most efficiently | ||
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:29:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | CY1PR0401MB106802FEA05429A88E407060C7D90@CY1PR0401MB1068.namprd04.prod.outlook.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Record sizes of directories of a directory tree (huge) most efficiently by Meino.Cramer@gmx.de | ||
| 1 | On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:25:37 +0100 |
| 2 | Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote - |
| 3 | > Hi, |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > I want to determine the size of the contents of all directories of a |
| 6 | > tree of directories on a hexacore AMD64 machine with 4GB RAM an one |
| 7 | > harddisk (containing that tree) -- most efficiently (least time |
| 8 | > consuming). |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > I tried this (cwd = root of that tree): |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > find . -depth -type d -print0 | xargs -0 -P 6 du -bsx {} \; |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > . Is there any to do this faster? |
| 15 | > |
| 16 | > Thank you very much in advance for any help! |
| 17 | > Best regards, |
| 18 | > Meino |
| 19 | |
| 20 | man du |
| 21 | |
| 22 | Dave F |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Record sizes of directories of a directory tree (huge) most efficiently | Dutch Ingraham <stoa@×××.us> |