Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update?
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:16:33
Message-Id: 20061017141110.13f8cff4@hactar.digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is it possible to protect *INDIVIDUAL FILES* against etc-update? by Walter Dnes
1 On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:57:57 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
2
3 > Maybe I didn't make myself clear enough. It works as designed. I did
4 > not overwrite the files, but I'm getting annoyed at having to tell
5 > etc-update "NO" every few weeks when I run etc-update. There are
6 > anywhere from 10 to 40 files to plow through. And I have a 7-year-old
7 > PIII Dell as my emergency backup machine, so I repeat the process all
8 > over again.
9
10 I've fixed the dispatch-conf patch in Bug #68618 to work with the latest
11 dispatch-conf. Add a line to /etc/dispatch-conf to specify files to be
12 ignored by dispatch-conf like
13
14 frozen="/etc/rc.conf /etc/conf.d/clock"
15
16 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618
17
18
19 --
20 Neil Bothwick
21
22 Don't forget that MS-Windows is just a temporary workaround until you can
23 switch to a GNU system.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature