1 |
* Stefan Wimmer <swimmer@××××××.nl> [2006-08-18 15:08] : |
2 |
> * Benno Schulenberg <benno.schulenberg@×××××.com> [2006-08-18 13:20] : |
3 |
> > It is probably a bug at Gentoo: look at the "X-Virus-Scanned: |
4 |
> > amavisd-new at gentoo.org" header that is inserted in Stefan's |
5 |
> > slrn-messages at a correct place. But after that the other extra |
6 |
> > headers get misplaced. Maybe this bug is being triggered by the |
7 |
> > first line of Stefan's slrn-messages starting with a space? As |
8 |
> > such a space normally means "continuation of previous line". |
9 |
> > Could you try adapting the attribution line of slrn to not start |
10 |
> > with a space, Stefan? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Ok - I removed the leading space from followup_string and reply_string |
13 |
> and test this followup now again with slrn ... I hope you are right and |
14 |
> this resolves the problem! |
15 |
|
16 |
BINGO!!! This resolved it indeed :) Many many thanks for your constructive post |
17 |
Benno! I would never had thought on that! |
18 |
The funny thing is that I was already searching in my ~/.slrnrc for any |
19 |
faults and found the leading space in {followup,reply}_string and |
20 |
removed it becaused I didn't like it. So I fixed it without knowing ;-) |
21 |
|
22 |
I apologize to all the people who got bothered by headers in the body in my |
23 |
posts. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks again Benno! |
27 |
|
28 |
Greetz |
29 |
Stefan |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |