| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:21 AM Jack <ostroffjh@×××××××××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> The --analyze phase bailed out before even starting. I filed an issue |
| 4 |
> upstream (mgorny's github repository) and he made a change (I didn't |
| 5 |
> look at the actual commit) so this situation should now be handled |
| 6 |
> correctly. I think he did want to accept anything that ended up |
| 7 |
> pointing to the right place, but was afraid of ending up with an |
| 8 |
> unpredictable result, so now it will accept either the relative or |
| 9 |
> absolute form. I don't know when he will release a new version. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
IMO that was the right design choice. You just don't want to mess |
| 13 |
around with these symlinks without care, so it is better to test that |
| 14 |
everything is as expected. Otherwise you'll break some system that |
| 15 |
somebody had tweaked 5 years ago and forgotten about. This way the |
| 16 |
edge cases get reported, and can be taken into account before opening |
| 17 |
things up more... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives