| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 04/16/2016 04:02 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Saturday, April 16, 2016 09:47:15 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On 16/04/2016 18:58, »Q« wrote: And the most complex thing |
| 7 |
>> portage had to deal with was virtuals. I don't think even SLOTs |
| 8 |
>> were around then. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I doubt it. I think SLOTs came sometime around 2010? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
SLOTs have been around a very long time, they were first introduced in |
| 14 |
portage 1.8.9_pre1, released 5 Feb 2002. Before SLOTs were |
| 15 |
introduced, all versions of a package were effectively in a different |
| 16 |
SLOT; this meant that portage would not remove an older version of a |
| 17 |
package just because you installed a newer version. At that time, |
| 18 |
portage did not have any collision-protect mechanism (or so it appears). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Jonathan Callen |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXFEsnAAoJEEIQbvYRB3mghrMP/jWD4xmikITRQ3UYRnTE/3t3 |
| 26 |
ZAXQqbv2PyBnu5D2tQ4QYBYiO7pfLGNMu+9nWbaI/q/LgflhqXDf5T5bTQClBkTv |
| 27 |
1IhF58J61xQMewI2/dQbhdzbuzUvPakC6SOoRUrM6awMwcqUUOXxlqWpexNZudOW |
| 28 |
FxrumkO+ohG/VfER0h7Cobp95tT4p6NpQNXhtncoFJekE/Fkqvzov2b+RPOnkQKL |
| 29 |
3FCfkByoW/UvmXw0Vt7V0DIaI4MPixe5MyG7b4NkWy3/IaesYZye+1UX+B6rKH1Y |
| 30 |
6fSNbkWkKm5O3APGkymVnxTtrQu14+RyfEXFMkGget7TlV3QihO4pJG7HlCzEzc+ |
| 31 |
v3P+BudoW8s3XKP+IDCjhvlCHHhilLO2CgJiFV73zFtxp1gOIgb86HHtnDIw/htm |
| 32 |
WpmvsA3hRSzr9xlj1j1shOl/fI7swPivSG7Tcl3x8THmgixZRp652m59AszPoog3 |
| 33 |
oGLEsjUlggHL/MSSTHgSRnzMWiAClD+Llx/3QG4mpB6VSJID03Q4v/F/myyElNDs |
| 34 |
cbnicePXD6lLfDJGhEZtV42YkKc2N2CV5aBmW+EWHR7hqLAmNepO6Olb2xIe8MJV |
| 35 |
YGRDIWmNj2EueUZSw3+XM/y3oU3Oh05wkaj4L3wQMFt1Jvfaxf4z44c+ZME0nZ+1 |
| 36 |
hqg1Qvlc98SYvhRqhChh |
| 37 |
=q+FB |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives