| 1 |
Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Jarry wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>Hi, |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>there was a thread concerning portage/emerge being recently fixed |
| 10 |
>>and faster now (sorry, forgot original subject). Well, I was really |
| 11 |
>>impressed by that improvement, until today: |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>>"emerge --sync" takes again very long time, nearly freezing at 51% |
| 14 |
>>of "updating portage cache", cpu load is on 99% load, 25 minutes and |
| 15 |
>>I'm still waiting. And 2 days ago the whole "emerge --sync" took |
| 16 |
>>about 3-4 minutes! Anyone else having the same experience? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>>Jarry |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>Same here just a bit ago. I did not use the du -s thing though. It |
| 24 |
>stayed around 50% for a while. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>What happened? Anybody know? |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>Dale |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
Same here too. No idea why. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
John Green |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives