Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not???
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:58:28
Message-Id: 436E26B1.7090408@exceedtech.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not??? by Jarry
1 Jarry wrote:
2
3 >Hi,
4 >
5 >there was a thread concerning portage/emerge being recently fixed
6 >and faster now (sorry, forgot original subject). Well, I was really
7 >impressed by that improvement, until today:
8 >
9 >"emerge --sync" takes again very long time, nearly freezing at 51%
10 >of "updating portage cache", cpu load is on 99% load, 25 minutes and
11 >I'm still waiting. And 2 days ago the whole "emerge --sync" took
12 >about 3-4 minutes! Anyone else having the same experience?
13 >
14 >Jarry
15 >
16 >
17 Same here just a bit ago. I did not use the du -s thing though. It
18 stayed around 50% for a while.
19
20 What happened? Anybody know?
21
22 Dale
23
24
25 --
26 To err is human, I'm most certainly human.
27
28
29
30 --
31 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] portage: fixed or not??? John Green <jg012b8403_2@×××××××××××××.uk>