1 |
Jarry wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>Hi, |
4 |
> |
5 |
>there was a thread concerning portage/emerge being recently fixed |
6 |
>and faster now (sorry, forgot original subject). Well, I was really |
7 |
>impressed by that improvement, until today: |
8 |
> |
9 |
>"emerge --sync" takes again very long time, nearly freezing at 51% |
10 |
>of "updating portage cache", cpu load is on 99% load, 25 minutes and |
11 |
>I'm still waiting. And 2 days ago the whole "emerge --sync" took |
12 |
>about 3-4 minutes! Anyone else having the same experience? |
13 |
> |
14 |
>Jarry |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
Same here just a bit ago. I did not use the du -s thing though. It |
18 |
stayed around 50% for a while. |
19 |
|
20 |
What happened? Anybody know? |
21 |
|
22 |
Dale |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
To err is human, I'm most certainly human. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |